This looks interesting but I don't know were it was taken. It seems a bit blurry in
relation to its background, maybe a photoshop job or motion blur.

I think its a actual picture of someone or something walking across the field. Although it looks as though the person/thing has been touched up. I could be wrong.

I came across the site that contained this picture plus several other pictures sometime last year. Although that is one of the better blended paste-ins, it is a photoshopped image. The others weren't as well blended as this one, and you could see the poorly-cut margins around the pasted-in BFs. This one does have a slight "halo" on the front, another common photoshop artifact (which usually comes from using the "feather" feature in PS). I'll try to find the site again, if I can.

Just my 2-cents, anyway.

I know about the photoshop stuff being done but I'm not familiar with how to determine when it's being done.

Generally Bog, when something has been photoshopped it doesn't mesh well with the
background image. Either its edges will be too blurry, of it will be too sharp. The above
photo seems to mesh better than most images, but I my opinion it still doesn't have a
natural vibe. Compare it to this pitiful photoshop job by Loren Coleman




Notice how sharp the edges are, it has a 2-dimensional look to it. Many people blur
the edges of the objects when doing these to try to cover it up.

I see what you're saying.

Oh, Ye of little faith!

To be honest, loren wasn't try to hoax anyone, it was just a practical joke he
made for his cryptomundo readers